Release: 1.4.39 | Release Date: June 24, 2022

# SQLAlchemy 1.4 Documentation

# Table Configuration with Declarative

As introduced at Declarative Mapping, the Declarative style includes the ability to generate a mapped `Table` object at the same time, or to accommodate a `Table` or other `FromClause` object directly.

The following examples assume a declarative base class as:

    from sqlalchemy.orm import declarative_base

    Base = declarative_base()

All of the examples that follow illustrate a class inheriting from the above `Base`. The decorator style introduced at Declarative Mapping using a Decorator (no declarative base) is fully supported with all the following examples as well.

## Declarative Table

With the declarative base class, the typical form of mapping includes an attribute `__tablename__` that indicates the name of a `Table` that should be generated along with the mapping:

    from sqlalchemy import Column, ForeignKey, Integer, String
    from sqlalchemy.orm import declarative_base

    Base = declarative_base()

    class User(Base):
        __tablename__ = "user"

        id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
        name = Column(String)
        fullname = Column(String)
        nickname = Column(String)

Above, `Column` objects are placed inline with the class definition. The declarative mapping process will generate a new `Table` object against the `MetaData` collection associated with the declarative base, and each specified `Column` object will become part of the `Table.columns` collection of this `Table` object. The `Column` objects can omit their “name” field, which is usually the first positional argument to the `Column` constructor; the declarative system will assign the key associated with each `Column` as the name, to produce a `Table` that is equivalent to:

    # equivalent Table object produced
    user_table = Table(
        "user",
        Base.metadata,
        Column("id", Integer, primary_key=True),
        Column("name", String),
        Column("fullname", String),
        Column("nickname", String),
    )

See also

Mapping Table Columns - contains additional notes on affecting how `Mapper` interprets incoming `Column` objects.

### Accessing Table and Metadata

A declaratively mapped class will always include an attribute called `__table__`; when the above configuration using `__tablename__` is complete, the declarative process makes the `Table` available via the `__table__` attribute:

    # access the Table
    user_table = User.__table__

The above table is ultimately the same one that corresponds to the `Mapper.local_table` attribute, which we can see through the runtime inspection system:

    from sqlalchemy import inspect

    user_table = inspect(User).local_table

The `MetaData` collection associated with both the declarative `registry` as well as the base class is frequently necessary in order to run DDL operations such as CREATE, as well as in use with migration tools such as Alembic. This object is available via the `.metadata` attribute of `registry` as well as the declarative base class. Below, for a small script we may wish to emit a CREATE for all tables against a SQLite database:

    engine = create_engine("sqlite://")

    Base.metadata.create_all(engine)

### Declarative Table Configuration

When using Declarative Table configuration with the `__tablename__` declarative class attribute, additional arguments to be supplied to the `Table` constructor should be provided using the `__table_args__` declarative class attribute.

This attribute accommodates both positional as well as keyword arguments that are normally sent to the `Table` constructor. The attribute can be specified in one of two forms. One is as a dictionary:

    class MyClass(Base):
        __tablename__ = "sometable"
        __table_args__ = {"mysql_engine": "InnoDB"}

The other, a tuple, where each argument is positional (usually constraints):

    class MyClass(Base):
        __tablename__ = "sometable"
        __table_args__ = (
            ForeignKeyConstraint(["id"], ["remote_table.id"]),
            UniqueConstraint("foo"),
        )

Keyword arguments can be specified with the above form by specifying the last argument as a dictionary:

    class MyClass(Base):
        __tablename__ = "sometable"
        __table_args__ = (
            ForeignKeyConstraint(["id"], ["remote_table.id"]),
            UniqueConstraint("foo"),
            {"autoload": True},
        )

A class may also specify the `__table_args__` declarative attribute, as well as the `__tablename__` attribute, in a dynamic style using the `declared_attr()` method decorator. See the section Mixin and Custom Base Classes for examples on how this is often used.

### Explicit Schema Name with Declarative Table

The schema name for a `Table` as documented at Specifying the Schema Name is applied to an individual `Table` using the `Table.schema` argument. When using Declarative tables, this option is passed like any other to the `__table_args__` dictionary:

    class MyClass(Base):
        __tablename__ = "sometable"
        __table_args__ = {"schema": "some_schema"}

The schema name can also be applied to all `Table` objects globally by using the `MetaData.schema` parameter documented at Specifying a Default Schema Name with MetaData. The `MetaData` object may be constructed separately and passed either to `registry()` or `declarative_base()`:

    from sqlalchemy import MetaData

    metadata_obj = MetaData(schema="some_schema")

    Base = declarative_base(metadata=metadata_obj)

    class MyClass(Base):
        # will use "some_schema" by default
        __tablename__ = "sometable"

See also

Specifying the Schema Name - in the Describing Databases with MetaData documentation.

### Appending additional columns to an existing Declarative mapped class

A declarative table configuration allows the addition of new `Column` objects to an existing mapping after the `Table` metadata has already been generated.

For a declarative class that is declared using a declarative base class, the underlying metaclass `DeclarativeMeta` includes a `__setattr__()` method that will intercept additional `Column` objects and add them to both the `Table` using `Table.append_column()` as well as to the existing `Mapper` using `Mapper.add_property()`:

    MyClass.some_new_column = Column("data", Unicode)

Additional `Column` objects may also be added to a mapping in the specific circumstance of using single table inheritance, where additional columns are present on mapped subclasses that have no `Table` of their own. This is illustrated in the section Single Table Inheritance.

## Declarative with Imperative Table (a.k.a. Hybrid Declarative)

Declarative mappings may also be provided with a pre-existing `Table` object, or otherwise a `Table` or other arbitrary `FromClause` construct (such as a `Join` or `Subquery`) that is constructed separately.

This is referred to as a “hybrid declarative” mapping, as the class is mapped using the declarative style for everything involving the mapper configuration, however the mapped `Table` object is produced separately and passed to the declarative process directly:

    from sqlalchemy import Column, ForeignKey, Integer, String
    from sqlalchemy.orm import declarative_base

    Base = declarative_base()

    # construct a Table directly.  The Base.metadata collection is
    # usually a good choice for MetaData but any MetaData
    # collection may be used.

    user_table = Table(
        "user",
        Base.metadata,
        Column("id", Integer, primary_key=True),
        Column("name", String),
        Column("fullname", String),
        Column("nickname", String),
    )

    # construct the User class using this table.
    class User(Base):
        __table__ = user_table

Above, a `Table` object is constructed using the approach described at Describing Databases with MetaData. It can then be applied directly to a class that is declaratively mapped. The `__tablename__` and `__table_args__` declarative class attributes are not used in this form. The above configuration is often more readable as an inline definition:

    class User(Base):
        __table__ = Table(
            "user",
            Base.metadata,
            Column("id", Integer, primary_key=True),
            Column("name", String),
            Column("fullname", String),
            Column("nickname", String),
        )

A natural effect of the above style is that the `__table__` attribute is itself defined within the class definition block. As such it may be immediately referred towards within subsequent attributes, such as the example below which illustrates referring to the `type` column in a polymorphic mapper configuration:

    class Person(Base):
        __table__ = Table(
            "person",
            Base.metadata,
            Column("id", Integer, primary_key=True),
            Column("name", String(50)),
            Column("type", String(50)),
        )

        __mapper_args__ = {
            "polymorphic_on": __table__.c.type,
            "polymorhpic_identity": "person",
        }

The “imperative table” form is also used when a non-`Table` construct, such as a `Join` or `Subquery` object, is to be mapped. An example below:

    from sqlalchemy import func, select

    subq = (
        select(
            func.count(orders.c.id).label("order_count"),
            func.max(orders.c.price).label("highest_order"),
            orders.c.customer_id,
        )
        .group_by(orders.c.customer_id)
        .subquery()
    )

    customer_select = (
        select(customers, subq)
        .join_from(customers, subq, customers.c.id == subq.c.customer_id)
        .subquery()
    )

    class Customer(Base):
        __table__ = customer_select

For background on mapping to non-`Table` constructs see the sections Mapping a Class against Multiple Tables and Mapping a Class against Arbitrary Subqueries.

The “imperative table” form is of particular use when the class itself is using an alternative form of attribute declaration, such as Python dataclasses. See the section Applying ORM Mappings to an existing dataclass for detail.

See also

Describing Databases with MetaData

Applying ORM Mappings to an existing dataclass

## Mapping Declaratively with Reflected Tables

There are several patterns available which provide for producing mapped classes against a series of `Table` objects that were introspected from the database, using the reflection process described at Reflecting Database Objects.

A very simple way to map a class to a table reflected from the database is to use a declarative hybrid mapping, passing the `Table.autoload_with` parameter to the `Table`:

    from sqlalchemy import create_engine
    from sqlalchemy import Table
    from sqlalchemy.orm import declarative_base

    engine = create_engine(
        "postgresql+psycopg2://user:pass@hostname/my_existing_database"
    )

    Base = declarative_base()

    class MyClass(Base):
        __table__ = Table(
            "mytable",
            Base.metadata,
            autoload_with=engine,
        )

A variant on the above pattern that scales much better is to use the `MetaData.reflect()` method to reflect a full set of `Table` objects at once, then refer to them from the `MetaData`:

    from sqlalchemy import create_engine
    from sqlalchemy import Table
    from sqlalchemy.orm import declarative_base

    engine = create_engine(
        "postgresql+psycopg2://user:pass@hostname/my_existing_database"
    )

    Base = declarative_base()

    Base.metadata.reflect(engine)

    class MyClass(Base):
        __table__ = Base.metadata.tables['mytable']

See also

Automating Column Naming Schemes from Reflected Tables - further notes on using table reflection with mapped classes

A major downside to the above approach is that the mapped classes cannot be declared until the tables have been reflected, which requires the database connectivity source to be present while the application classes are being declared; it’s typical that classes are declared as the modules of an application are being imported, but database connectivity isn’t available until the application starts running code so that it can consume configuration information and create an engine. There are currently two approaches to working around this.

### Using DeferredReflection

To accommodate the use case of declaring mapped classes where reflection of table metadata can occur afterwards, a simple extension called the `DeferredReflection` mixin is available, which alters the declarative mapping process to be delayed until a special class-level `DeferredReflection.prepare()` method is called, which will perform the reflection process against a target database, and will integrate the results with the declarative table mapping process, that is, classes which use the `__tablename__` attribute:

    from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import DeferredReflection
    from sqlalchemy.orm import declarative_base

    Base = declarative_base()

    class Reflected(DeferredReflection):
        __abstract__ = True

    class Foo(Reflected, Base):
        __tablename__ = "foo"
        bars = relationship("Bar")

    class Bar(Reflected, Base):
        __tablename__ = "bar"

        foo_id = Column(Integer, ForeignKey("foo.id"))

Above, we create a mixin class `Reflected` that will serve as a base for classes in our declarative hierarchy that should become mapped when the `Reflected.prepare` method is called. The above mapping is not complete until we do so, given an `Engine`:

    engine = create_engine(
        "postgresql+psycopg2://user:pass@hostname/my_existing_database"
    )
    Reflected.prepare(engine)

The purpose of the `Reflected` class is to define the scope at which classes should be reflectively mapped. The plugin will search among the subclass tree of the target against which `.prepare()` is called and reflect all tables which are named by declared classes; tables in the target database that are not part of mappings and are not related to the target tables via foreign key constraint will not be reflected.

### Using Automap

A more automated solution to mapping against an existing database where table reflection is to be used is to use the Automap extension. This extension will generate entire mapped classes from a database schema, including relationships between classes based on observed foreign key constraints. While it includes hooks for customization, such as hooks that allow custom class naming and relationship naming schemes, automap is oriented towards an expedient zero-configuration style of working. If an application wishes to have a fully explicit model that makes use of table reflection, the Using DeferredReflection may be preferable.

See also

Automap